| Matter of Sepulveda v Romano |
| Motion No: 2010-04030 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2010 NY Slip Op 82953(U) |
| Decided on September 21, 2010 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M108568
M/nl
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
JOSEPH COVELLO
RUTH C. BALKIN
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
|
2010-04030
In the Matter of Julia Sepulveda, appellant, v George R. Romano, respondent. (Docket No. F-08392-06)
| DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Julia Sepulveda from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated April 20, 2010. By order to show cause dated July 9, 2010, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the above-entitled appeal for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated May 19, 2010, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2). Separate motion by the appellant for leave to proceed on the above-entitled appeal as a poor person.
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is denied as unnecessary (see Family Ct Act § 1116), and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branches of the appellant's motion which are to waive the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel are denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 20 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4), above, has been taken within 20 days of the date of this scheduling order, the appeal may be dismissed.
SKELOS, J.P., COVELLO, BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court