| Matter of Arthur v Arthur |
| Motion No: 2010-03465 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2010 NY Slip Op 87189(U) |
| Decided on November 5, 2010 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M110556
E/sl
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ARIEL E. BELEN
PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.
|
2010-03465 In the Matter of George Anthony Paul Arthur, appellant, v Beatrice Latisha Arthur, respondent. (Docket Nos. V-03473-08, V-03474-08)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by George Anthony Paul Arthur from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 9, 2010. By order to show cause dated September 9, 2010, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated April 20, 2010, issued pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).
Now, on the court's own motion, and no papers having been filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
SKELOS, J.P., SANTUCCI, BELEN and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court