| Matter of Olmeda v Soto |
| Motion No: 2010-05669 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2010 NY Slip Op 87205(U) |
| Decided on November 5, 2010 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M110562
E/sl
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ARIEL E. BELEN
PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.
|
2010-05669 In the Matter of Alexis Olmeda, respondent, v Eddie Soto, appellant. (Docket No. O-1553-10)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Eddie Soto from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated May 21, 2010. By order to show cause dated September 29, 2010, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving counsel assigned by order on certification of this court dated August 24, 2010, to perfect the appeal on behalf of the appellant on the ground that the attorney has been unable to contact the appellant, and dismissing the appeal.
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the assigned counsel is relieved of the assignment; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
SKELOS, J.P., SANTUCCI, BELEN and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court