| Goldberg & Connolly v Tadco Constr. Corp. |
| Motion No: 2010-02695 nc |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 61441(U) |
| Decided on January 10, 2011 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
of the State of New York for the 9th & 10th judicial Districts
MELVYN TANENBAUM, J.P.
DENISE F. MOLIA
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
| Goldberg & Connolly, Respondent, v Tadco Construction Corp., Appellant. |
Motion by respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, First District, dated June 24, 2010. Separate motion by respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the same court dated July 26, 2010.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the motions are consolidated for the purposes of disposition; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motions are granted and the appeals are dismissed on the ground that appellant must appear by attorney (see CPLR 321 [a]); Hilton Apothecary v State of New York, 89 NY2d 1024 [1997]).
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk