| Sokol, also known as Suckle v Daycock |
| Motion No: 2010-03252 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 61704(U) |
| Decided on January 19, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M114278
E/sl
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.
|
2010-03252 Howard Sokol, also known as Howard Suckle, respondent, v Suzanne Daycock, appellant, et al., defendants. (Index No. 08-6271)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated January 19, 2010.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 18, 2011, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
FLORIO, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court