| Matter of Fitje v Fitje |
| Motion No: 2010-11201 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 67416(U) |
| Decided on March 18, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M117170
E/sl
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
L. PRISCILLA HALL
PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.
|
2010-11201 In the Matter of Janine Fitje, appellant, v Justin Fitje, respondent. (Docket Nos. V-18574/10, V-18575/10)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Janine Fitje from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated October 19, 2010. By order to show cause dated February 8, 2011, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated December 22, 2010, issued pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]). Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.
Upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing her brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 18, 2011; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.
RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, HALL and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court