| Matter of Hedrington v Audain |
| Motion No: 2010-10037 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 67422(U) |
| Decided on March 18, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M117142
E/sl
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
PLUMMER E. LOTT
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
|
2010-10037 In the Matter of Jerrilyn Hedrington, respondent, v Mark E. Audain, appellant. (Docket No. O-09116-10)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Mark E. Audain from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 9, 2010. By order to show cause dated February 9, 2011, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving counsel assigned by order on certification dated December 7, 2010, to perfect the appeal on behalf of the appellant on the ground that the attorney has been unable to contact the appellant, and dismissing the appeal.
Upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto,
it is
ORDERED that the assigned counsel is relieved of the assignment; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
RIVERA, J.P., HALL, LOTT and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court