| Breidbart v Wiesenthal |
| Motion No: 2010-10658 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 68718(U) |
| Decided on March 31, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M117894
E/sl
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ANITA R. FLORIO
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
|
2010-10658 Murray Breidbart, et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v Melvin L. Wiesenthal, et al., defendants, Frances Levenstein, defendant-respondent, Samuel Goldstein, et al., appellants. (Index No. 6038/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the plaintiffs-respondents to enlarge the record on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 15, 2010, to include a reply affirmation dated September 10, 2009.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
DILLON, J.P., FLORIO, CHAMBERS and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court