| Matter of Manko v New York State Division of Housing and |
| Motion No: 2009-08402 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 70982(U) |
| Decided on April 26, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M116969
E/sl
JOSEPH COVELLO, J.P.
RANDALL T. ENG
L. PRISCILLA HALL
PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.
|
2009-08402 In the Matter of Nella Manko, et al., appellants, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Office of Rent Administration, respondent. (Index No. 26610/08)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant Nella Manko on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 7, 2009, inter alia, to subpoena the original papers constituting the record on appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County, for leave to file a supplemental appendix containing the answer, the respondent's affirmation in opposition, and the respondent's memorandum of law, and to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to subpoena the original papers constituting the record on appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County, is denied as unnecessary, as the original papers constituting the record on appeal were subpoenaed from the Supreme Court, Kings County, on April 22, 2011; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to file a supplemental appendix containing the answer, the respondent's affirmation in opposition, and the respondent's memorandum of law is granted, and on or before May 26, 2011, the appellant shall serve and file a supplemental appendix containing those documents; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief is granted, the appellant's time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until May 26, 2011, and the reply brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
COVELLO, J.P., ENG, HALL and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court