| Matter of Narvaez v Cerisier |
| Motion No: 2011-00428 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 71606(U) |
| Decided on May 3, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M119429
E/sl
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
PETER B. SKELOS
ANITA R. FLORIO
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
|
2011-00428 In the Matter of Brunilda Narvaez, respondent, v James Cerisier, appellant. (Docket No. F-2963/10)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by James Cerisier from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated December 28, 2010. By order to show cause dated March 16, 2011, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated January 28, 2011, issued pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).
Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing a brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 20, 2011.
RIVERA, J.P., SKELOS, FLORIO and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court