| Kreymer v Kreymer |
| Motion No: 2011-01119 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 73029(U) |
| Decided on May 17, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M120162
E/sl
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
PLUMMER E. LOTT
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
|
2011-01119 Tammy Kreymer, respondent, v Peter Kreymer, appellant. (Index No. 3225/10)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Peter Kreymer from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated December 3, 2010. By order to show cause dated April 6, 2011, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated February 23, 2011, issued pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).
Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated February 23, 2011, issued pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, LOTT and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court