| Goldman v Rio |
| Motion No: 2011-02699 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 83192(U) |
| Decided on September 12, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M125495
S/sl
|
2011-02699, 2011-07832
Michael Goldman, appellant, v Richard R. Rio, et al., respondents. (Index No. 9284/10)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 14, 2011, and June 17, 2011, respectively, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated February 14, 2011, and to consolidate the appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is to enlarge time is granted to the extent that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal from the order dated February 14, 2011, is enlarged until November 7, 2011, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date, and that branch of the application is otherwise denied.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court