| Andrade v T.C. Dunham Paint Company, Inc. |
| Motion No: |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 84204(U) |
| Decided on September 21, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M126160
E/sl
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
MARK C. DILLON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
|
2011-00053 Walter Andrade, appellant, v T.C. Dunham Paint Company, Inc., et al., respondents. (Index No. 22766/07)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the respondent Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc., to strike Point II of the brief filed by the respondents T.C. Dunham Paint Company, Inc., T.C. Dunham Paint and Coatings Co., Inc., and D & F Paint Co., Inc., on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 8, 2010.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted (see Katz v Katz, 68 AD2d 536), Point II of the brief filed by the respondents T.C. Dunham Paint Company, Inc., T.C. Dunham Paint and Coatings Co., Inc., and D & F Paint Co., Inc., is stricken, and on or before October 6, 2011, the respondents T.C. Dunham Paint Company, Inc., T.C. Dunham Paint and Coatings Co., Inc., and D & F Paint Co., Inc., shall either remove that material from the copies of the brief filed with the Clerk of the Court or serve and file a replacement brief that does not contain the stricken material.
MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, CHAMBERS and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court