| Jones v Rochdale Village, Inc. |
| Motion No: |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 84241(U) |
| Decided on September 21, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M126159
E/sl
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
MARK C. DILLON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
|
2010-10489 Cheryl Jones, plaintiff-appellant, v Rochdale Village, Inc., appellant-respondent, Nytech Window Systems, Inc., et al., respondents, Arcadia Architectural Products, Inc., et al., defendants-appellants, Howard L. Zimmerman Architect, P.C., respondent-appellant. (Index No. 33054/09)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant-respondent, joined by the plaintiff-appellant, and the defendants-appellants Werfel & Assoc. Architects, P.C., Lawrence Werfel & Associates, and Lawrence Werfel to enlarge the time to perfect appeals and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 30, 2010.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motions is granted, the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until October 6, 2011, the joint record or appendix on the appeals (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the briefs of the appellant-respondent, the plaintiff-appellant, and the defendants-appellants must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).
MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, CHAMBERS and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court