| Baxter v Javier |
| Motion No: 2010-11568 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2011 NY Slip Op 86618(U) |
| Decided on October 14, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M127216
E/sl
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
RANDALL T. ENG
ARIEL E. BELEN
L. PRISCILLA HALL, JJ.
|
2010-11568, 2011-07793 Robert C. Baxter, appellant-respondent, v Mark Javier, et al., respondents-appellants. (Index No. 8806-00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant-respondent to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 18, 2010, and to consolidate the appeal and cross appeal from that order with an appeal from an order of the same Court dated July 28, 2011.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant-respondent's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 5, 2011, the joint record or appendix on appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondents-appellants shall serve and file their answering brief, including their points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of the Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]).
MASTRO, J.P., ENG, BELEN and HALL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court