| Chaim Halberstam & Roiza Halberstam v Judy Kramer |
| Motion No: 2010-01457 kc |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 63038(U) |
| Decided on January 27, 2012 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
of the State of New York for the 2nd, 11th & 13th judicial Districts
MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J.
MICHELLE WESTON
JAIME A. RIOS, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
| Chaim Halberstam and Roiza Halberstam, Respondents, v Judy Kramer, Appellant. |
Motion by appellant for an enlargement of time to perfect appeals from a final judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered April 7, 2010, and from orders of the same court entered July 14, 2009, November 9, 2009 and August 11, 2010, and to continue a stay granted by decision and order of this court dated December 2, 2010.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion seeking an enlargement of time to perfect the appeal is granted and the appeal shall be perfected by February 15, 2012; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion seeking to continue the stay granted by decision and order of this court dated December 2, 2010 is granted on condition that appellant perfect the appeal by February 15, 2012 and continue to comply with the other conditions contained in the decision and order of this court dated December 2, 2010; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the above conditions are not met, the court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, or respondents may move to vacate the stay on three days' notice.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk