| People v Farkas, Isidore |
| Motion No: 2011-07277 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 67242(U) |
| Decided on March 14, 2012 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M134779
S/nl
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.
|
2011-07277
The People, etc., respondent, v Isidore Farkas, appellant. (Ind. No. 9106/06)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant, in effect, to amend a decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 18, 2011, as amended September 27, 2011, and November 29, 2011, which granted the appellant's motion pursuant to CPL 460.50 for a stay of execution of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 10, 2011, and directed that the appellant be released from incarceration upon certain conditions, inter alia, to allow the appellant to attend a family wedding and ancillary religious observances, and to attend Passover services with his family.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 18, 2011, as amended September 27, 2011, and November 29, 2011, is further amended by adding to the provision thereof which imposed a condition that the appellant remain confined to house arrest and wear an electronic monitoring bracelet, with monitoring services to be provided by Secure Alert and paid for by the appellant, the following: "the appellant shall be allowed to attend a wedding on March 19, 2012, at a hall located at 1415 54th Street, Brooklyn, New York, from 6:30 to 10:30 P.M., on condition that the appellant informs the District Attorney of Kings County and Secure Alert of the exact route he intends to follow to and from the site of the above-referenced wedding"; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
Associate Justice