| Daniel Singer v Casey Krul |
| Motion No: 2012-137 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 68604 |
| Decided on March 29, 2012 |
| Court of Appeals Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Daniel Singer,
Appellant,
v
Casey Krul,
Respondent.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., times.ttf lv dismissed 14 NY3d 748 [2010]).