| IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITY OF ROCHESTER FOR AN "INSPECTION WARRANT" TO INSPECT 449 CEDARWOOD TERRACE |
| Motion No: CA 11-00089 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 68645(U) |
| Decided on March 16, 2012 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
PRESENT: SMITH, J. P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
DOCKET NO. CA 11-00089
MOTION NO. 1093-11
DOCKET NO. CA 11-00362
MOTION NO. 1094-11
AN "INSPECTION WARRANT" TO INSPECT 449-451 CEDARWOOD TERRACE,
| IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITY OF ROCHESTER FOR AN
"INSPECTION WARRANT" TO INSPECT 449 CEDARWOOD TERRACE, CITY OF ROCHESTER, COUNTY OF MONROE, STATE OF NEW YORK. JILL
CERMAK AND BRUCE HENRY, APPELLANTS, V CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 1.) IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF
CITY OF ROCHESTER FOR CITY OF ROCHESTER, COUNTY OF MONROE, STATE OF NEW YORK.
——————————————————————&
mdash;———— JILL CERMAK AND BRUCE HENRY, APPELLANTS, V CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO.
2.) |
Appellants having moved for reargument of or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from orders of this Court entered December 23, 2011,
Now, upon reading and filing the affirmations of Michael A. Burger, Esq., dated January 25, 2012, and February 6, 2012, the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and the affidavit of Adam M. Clark, Esq., sworn to February 3, 2012, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied.
Entered: March 16, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk