| Matter of Bruno v Gonzalez |
| Motion No: 2011-11651 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 71589(U) |
| Decided on April 27, 2012 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M136740
E/sl
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
RANDALL T. ENG
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
|
2011-11651 In the Matter of Eileen Bruno, appellant, v Michael Gonzalez, respondent. (Docket Nos. V-11441-01/06E, V-11441-01/06F, V-11441-01/08G, V-11441-01/08H, V-11441-01/09I, V-29411-09)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Eileen Bruno from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 16, 2011. By order to show cause dated March 13, 2012, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the attorney assigned by order on certification of this Court dated January 30, 2012, to perfect the appeal on behalf of the appellant on the ground that the attorney had been unable to contact the appellant, and dismissing the appeal.
Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, assigned counsel is relieved of the assignment, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).
SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, ENG and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court