| MATTER OF MALINDA A. PRINZING V PAUL G. GUCK, AND DORIS M. GUCK |
| Motion No: CAF 11-01903 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 76658(U) |
| Decided on June 18, 2012 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ.
APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. CAF 11-01903
DOCKET NO. O-00610-11, O-00611-11
DOCKET NO. V-00304-11, V-00305-11
DOCKET NO. V-01519-10-11A & B, V-01520-10/11A & B
APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. CAF 12-00067
DOCKET NO. V-00304-11-11B
DOCKET NO. V-1519-1520-10-11C
| MATTER OF MALINDA A. PRINZING, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V PAUL G.
GUCK, AND DORIS M. GUCK, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. MATTER OF JASON R. GUCK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V CARL E.
PRINZING, AND MALINDA A. PRINZING,
RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. —————————————————&md
ash;—————————————————————&mdas
h;—————— MATTER OF PAUL G. GUCK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V CARL E. PRINZING, AND MALINDA A.
PRINZING, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. MATTER OF JASON R. GUCK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V MALINDA A. PRINZING AND CARL E. PRINZING,
RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. —————————————————————&
mdash;—————————————————————&m
dash;—— MATTER OF PAUL G. GUCK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V MALINDA A. PRINZING AND CARL E. PRINZING,
RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. |
Petitioner-respondent Jason Guck having moved for permission to proceed as a poor person and for assignment of counsel on the appeals taken herein from orders of the Family Court, Wayne County, entered in the Office of the Clerk of said Court on September 19, 2011, and January 4, 2012,
Now, upon reading and filing the affidavit of Jason Guck, sworn to April 24, 2012, and the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks the assignment of counsel is denied on the ground that such relief is not authorized (see Family Court Act §§262, 1120 [a]), and
It is further ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks permission to proceed as a poor person is denied on the ground that petitioner-respondent would receive no effective relief from such an order.
Entered: June 18, 2012
FRANCES E. CAFARELL, Clerk