| Matter of Rivera v Fowler |
| Motion No: 2012-01555 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 77434(U) |
| Decided on June 27, 2012 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M139907
E/sl
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
PETER B. SKELOS
SHERI S. ROMAN
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
|
2012-01555 In the Matter of Oswaldo Rivera, respondent, v Karen Fowler, appellant. (Docket Nos. V-1058-99, V-3433-99)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se, inter alia, to stay enforcement of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated January 13, 2012, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom, in effect, to relieve assigned counsel, to continue poor person relief, and for leave to proceed pro se on the appeal and in the Family Court, Suffolk County, and to be permitted to inspect the Family Court file. By order on certification of this Court, dated February 24, 2012, the appellant was granted leave to proceed as a poor person and the following named attorney was assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Harry Tilis, Esq.
80 Orville Drive - Suite 100
Bohemia, N.Y. 11716
631-244-1615
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are, in effect, to relieve assigned counsel, to continue poor person relief and for leave to proceed pro se on the appeal is granted, and said assigned counsel is directed to turn over the transcripts and the papers in the proceedings to the appellant pro se; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant pro se shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any scheduling order or orders issued pursuant to § 670.4 of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to proceed pro se in the Family Court, Suffolk County, is denied without prejudice to seeking relief in the Family Court; and it is further,
ORDERED that branch of the motion which is to be permitted to inspect the Family Court file is granted to the extent permitted by the rules and any orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
RIVERA, J.P., SKELOS, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court