| Matter of Comerford v Kraus |
| Motion No: 2011-05507 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 83059(U) |
| Decided on August 30, 2012 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M142901
J/sl
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, A.P.J.
RANDALL T. ENG
PLUMMER E. LOTT
JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.
|
2011-05507 In the Matter of Tania I. Comerford, respondent, v Ronald F. Kraus, appellant. (Docket No. F-4189-04/11K)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Ronald F. Kraus from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated May 31, 2011. By order to show cause dated May 10, 2012, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the attorney assigned by decision and order on motion dated March 14, 2012, to perfect the appeal on behalf of the appellant on the ground that the attorney had been unable to contact the appellant, and dismissing the appeal.
Upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, assigned counsel is relieved of the assignment, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).
MASTRO, A.P.J., ENG, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court