| Breytman v Pinnacle Group |
| Motion No: 2012-00836 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 83512(U) |
| Decided on September 10, 2012 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M143027
E/sl
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
RANDALL T. ENG
PLUMMER E. LOTT
JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.
|
2012-00836, 2012-00840 Alexander Breytman, appellant, v Pinnacle Group, respondent. (Index No. 4828/11)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 24, 2011, and October 21, 2011, respectively, and to waive the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the record or appendix on the appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals is granted, the appellant's time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until October 9, 2012, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the record or appendix on the appeals is denied without prejudice to renew when the appeals are perfected; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
RIVERA, J.P., ENG, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court