| Matter of Pezolano v Pezolano |
| Motion No: 2012-03902 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 85916(U) |
| Decided on September 28, 2012 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M144255
E/sl
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
ANITA R. FLORIO
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
L. PRISCILLA HALL, JJ.
|
2012-03902 In the Matter of Kasey Pezolano, respondent, v Kathleen Pezolano, appellant. (Docket Nos. V-2359-05/11D, V-4534-07)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Kathleen Pezolano from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 20, 2012. By order to show cause dated August 3, 2012, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the attorney assigned by order on certification of this Court dated June 19, 2012, to perfect the appeal on behalf of the appellant on the ground that the attorney had been unable to contact the appellant, and dismissing the appeal.
Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, assigned counsel is relieved of the assignment, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).
RIVERA, J.P., FLORIO, CHAMBERS and HALL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court