| Bruce S. Reznick v Lauren Mishkin |
| Motion No: 2012-01827 kc |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 88846(U) |
| Decided on October 22, 2012 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
of the State of New York for the 2nd, 11th & 13th judicial Districts
MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J.
JAIME A. RIOS
THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
| Bruce S. Reznick, Respondent, v Lauren Mishkin, Appellant. |
Motion by appellant for a stay pending the determination of an appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, dated August 14, 2012.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the appeal is dismissed on the ground that appellant submitted no papers in opposition to the motion of respondent giving rise to the order being appealed, thus, the order is deemed entered on default and is not appealable (see CPLR 5511; M & C Bros., Inc. v Torum, 75 AD3d 869 [2010]; Benitez v Olson, 29 AD3d 503 [2006]; Fox v T.B.S.D., Inc., 278 AD2d 612 [2000]). Appellant's remedy, if she be so advised, is to seek relief in the Civil Court upon a written motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that appellant's motion is denied as moot.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk