| Archstone v Tocci Building Corporation of New Jersey, In |
| Motion No: 2012-00678 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 91326(U) |
| Decided on November 26, 2012 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M147051
J/ct
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
L. PRISCILLA HALL
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
|
2012-00678, 2012-09385 Archstone, et al., respondents, v Tocci Building Corporation of New Jersey, Inc., appellant, et al., defendants (and other titles). (Appeal No. 1) Archstone, et al., appellants, v Tocci Building Corp. of New Jersey, Inc., et al., respondents , et al., defendants (and other titles). (Appeal No. 2) (Index Nos. 1018/08, 5292/07, 6064/07)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Separate motions by Archstone and Archstone-Smith Westbury, L.P., to admit pro hac vice Robert Lee Crewdson and John S. Ducat III, attorneys in good standing in the State of Georgia, to represent them on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 5, 2011, and October 4, 2012, respectively, and all future appeals taken in the above-entitled actions.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branches of the motions which are to admit pro hac vice Robert Lee Crewdson and John S. Ducat III to represent Archstone and Archstone-Smith Westbury, L.P., on the appeals from the orders entered December 5, 2011, and October 4, 2012, respectively, are granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied without prejudice to seeking relief if further appeals are taken.
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court