| Loaiza v Lam |
| Motion No: 2011-09073 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 93142(U) |
| Decided on December 10, 2012 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M147903
E/sl
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
PLUMMER E. LOTT
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
|
2011-09073 Mateo Loaiza, et al., appellants, v Henry Lam, etc., et al., respondents. (Index No. 2692/09)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 25, 2011.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants' time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 31, 2012, and the reply brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, LOTT and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court