| People v Isakov, Mikhail, also known as Izaikov, Mikail, also |
| Motion No: 2012-04332 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2013 NY Slip Op 62630(U) |
| Decided on January 24, 2013 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M150262
E/sl
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
SYLVIA HINDS-RADIX, JJ.
|
2012-04332, 2012-04333, 2012-04334, 2012-04338, 2012-04339, 2012-04340, 2012-04341, 2012-04346 The People, etc., respondent, v Mikhail Isakov, also known as Mikhail Izaikov, also known as Mikhail Izraikov, appellant. (Appeal No. 1) The People, etc., respondent, v Arthur Ibragimov, appellant. (Appeal No. 2) The People, etc., respondent, v David Ibragimov, also known as David Ibragmchayev, appellant. (Appeal No. 3) The People, etc., respondent, v Mikhail Isakov, also known as Mikhail Izaikov, also known as Mikhail Izraikov, appellant. (Appeal No. 4) The People, etc., respondent, v MB Globus, LLC, appellant. (Appeal No. 5)
The People, etc., respondent, v AN International, LLC, appellant. (Appeal No. 6)
The People, etc., respondent, v MA Concord, LLC, appellant. (Appeal No. 7)
The People, etc., respondent, v NA Continental Group, LLC, appellant. (Appeal No. 8)
The People, etc., respondent, v SI Premier Enterprises, LLC, appellant. (Appeal No. 9) (Ind. No. 9283/10)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellants for leave to file a joint brief and appendix on appeals from five judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 4, 2012, and three judgments of the same court rendered April 5, 2012. Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant's time to perfect the appeals is enlarged, and the appellant's joint appendix and the appellant's joint brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court are accepted for filing and deemed timely served.
DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, LEVENTHAL and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court