| Matter of Spector; Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicia |
| Motion No: 2013-01978 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2013 NY Slip Op 81053(U) |
| Decided on July 30, 2013 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M160146
E/ct
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
MARK C. DILLON
JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.
|
2013-01978 In the Matter of Neal Stuart Spector, a suspended attorney. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, petitioner; Neal Stuart Spector, respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 1937424)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
On the Court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 11, 2013, in the above-entitled case is recalled and vacated, and the following decision and order on motion is substituted therefor:
The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department on July 30. 1984. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated May 13, 2013, the respondent was immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 191.4(l)(1)(i).
On the Court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that Robert P. Guido, Special Counsel for Grievance Matters, 30 East Hoffman Avenue, Lindenhurst, N.Y. 11757-5011, is hereby appointed as inventory attorney pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10(g) (1) to take custody of, and inventory, the respondent's legal files, which are currently in the possession of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, and return them to the respondent's former clients, (2) to take custody of, and safeguard, the records of any business, escrow, trust, or special account(s) of the respondent, which are currently in the possession of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, (3) receive, open, and read mail addressed to the respondent at his regular place of business, and (4) to take such other action as is deemed proper and advisable to protect the interests of the respondent's former clients, and secondarily, the interests of the respondent attorney.
ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court