| People v Isakov, Mikhail, also known as Izaikov, Mikhail, als |
| Motion No: 2012-04332 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2013 NY Slip Op 84423(U) |
| Decided on September 5, 2013 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division : Second Judicial Department
M161834
S/nl
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, J.
|
2012-04332
The People, etc., respondent, v Mikhail Isakov, also known as Mikhail Izaikov, also known as Mikhail Izraikov, appellant. (Appeal No. 1) (Ind. No. 9283/10)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
2012-04333
The People, etc., respondent,
v Arthur Ibragimov, appellant.
(Appeal No. 2)
(Ind. No. 9283/10)
2012-04334
The People, etc., respondent, v David Ibragimov,
also known as David Ibragmchayev, appellant.
(Appeal No. 3)
(Ind. No. 9283/10)
2012-04338
The People, etc., respondent,
v MB Globus, LLC, appellant.
(Appeal No. 4)
(Ind. No. 9283/10)
2012-04339
The People, etc., respondent,
v AN International, LLC, appellant.
(Appeal No. 5)
(Ind. No. 9283/10)
2012-04340
The People, etc., respondent,
v MA Concord, LLC, appellant.
(Appeal No. 6)
(Ind. No. 9283/10)
2012-04341
The People, etc., respondent,
v NA Continental Group, LLC, appellant.
(Appeal No. 7)
(Ind. No. 9283/10)
2012-04346
The People, etc., respondent,
v SI Premier Enterprises, LLC, appellant.
(Appeal No. 8)
(Ind. No. 9283/10)
2012-02821
The People, etc., respondent,
v Jan Gilbert, appellant.
(Appeal No. 9)
(Ind. No. 9283/10)
Motion by the appellant Jan Gilbert on appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 28, 2012, five judgments of the same court rendered April 4, 2012, and three judgments of the same court rendered April 5, 2013, pursuant to CPL 460.50 to stay so much of the judgment rendered February 28, 2012, as directed him to pay restitution in the sum of $20,000.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
Associate Justice