| Olga Caro v Marsh USA, Inc. |
| Motion No: 2013-664 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2013 NY Slip Op 85349 |
| Decided on September 17, 2013 |
| Court of Appeals Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Olga Caro,
Appellant,
v
Marsh USA, Inc., et al.,
Respondents.
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from so much of the Supreme Court order as directed that the video recording of all future depositions be at appellant's attorney's expense, dismissed upon the ground that as to that part of the Appellate Division order, appellant is not a party aggrieved; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.