| New York Telephone Company v Supervisor of Town of |
| Motion No: 2012-09825 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2013 NY Slip Op 89676(U) |
| Decided on October 28, 2013 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M164411
S/ct
|
2012-09825, 2013-01767
New York Telephone Company, plaintiff- appellant, v Supervisor of Town of Hempstead, et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents, et al., defendants; County of Nassau, et al., third-party defendants-appellants. (Index No. 12177/98)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
2012-09833, 2013-01777
New York Telephone Company, plaintiff-
appellant, v Supervisor of Town of Hempstead,
et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents,
et al., defendants; County of Nassau, et al.,
third-party defendants-appellants.
(Index No. 6578/01)
2012-09840, 2013-01788
New York Telephone Company, plaintiff-
appellant, v Supervisor of Town of Hempstead,
et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents,
et al., defendants; County of Nassau, et al.,
third-party defendants-appellants.
(Index No. 6794/00)
2012-09844, 2013-01782
Verizon New York, Inc., formerly known as
New York Telephone Company, plaintiff-appellant,
v Supervisor of Town of Hempstead, et al., defendants
third-party plaintiffs-respondents, et al., defendants;
County of Nassau, et al., third-party defendants-
appellants.
(Index No. 6858/02)
2012-09857, 2013-01784
New York Telephone Company, plaintiff-appellant,
v Supervisor of Town of Hempstead, et al., defendants
third-party plaintiffs-respondents, et al., defendants;
County of Nassau, et al., third-party defendants-
appellants.
(Index No. 11522/99)
Application by the third-party defendants-appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both dated July 24, 2012, three amended orders of the same court all dated July 24, 2012, and five orders of the same court all dated November 27, 2012.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the applicants' time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until November 14, 2013, and the reply brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court