| Matter of Cynthia Young v William Fruci etc. |
| Motion No: 2013-1294 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2013 NY Slip Op 95438 |
| Decided on December 31, 2013 |
| Court of Appeals Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
In the Matter of Cynthia Young,
Appellant,
v
William Fruci et al., etc.,
et al.,
Respondents,
Paul J. Sausville,
Respondent.
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [1929] [Cardozo, Ch. J.]).