Ameritel Management, Inc. v Tanvir
Motion No: 2012-09204
Slip Opinion No: 2014 NY Slip Op 66124(U)
Decided on March 11, 2014
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M170447

E/sl

PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.

THOMAS A. DICKERSON

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL

L. PRISCILLA HALL, JJ.

2012-09204, 2013-08945, 2014-01214

Ameritel Management, Inc., respondent,

v Shahid Tanvir, appellant.

(Index No. 500330/12)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motions by the respondent on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 12, 2012, and May 23, 2013, respectively, and a judgment of the same court dated December 12, 2013, to dismiss the appeals from the orders on the ground that the right of direct appeal from the orders terminated upon entry of the judgment. Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated May 23, 2013.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motions are held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeals for determination upon the argument or submission thereof; and it is further,

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the appeals will be calendared together and will be argued or submitted on the same date; and it is further,

ORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant's time to perfect the appeal from the order dated May 23, 2013, is enlarged until May 12, 2014, and the record or appendix on that appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the appellant must perfect the appeal from the judgment dated December 12, 2013, by serving and filing the record or appendix on that appeal and the appellant's brief on or before May 12, 2014.

SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, LEVENTHAL and HALL, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court