Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M172004

E/sl

2013-02325 Bryan J. Pacelli, et al., respondents, v Intruck Leasing Corp., et al., defendants, EMH Consulting, et al., appellants. (Action No. 1) National Interstate Insurance Company, as of Schoolman Transportation System, Inc. respondents, v Intruck Leasing Corp., et al defendants, EMH Consulting, appellant. (Action No. 2) Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, e v Westbury Paper Stock Corp., et al., defe (Action No. 3) Michelle Galluzo, respondent, v Intruck Leasing Corp., et al., defendants, Westbury Paper Stock Corp., et al., appell (Action No. 4) Kristine Blume, respondent, v Intruck Leasing Corp., et al., defendants, EMH Co et al., appellants. (Action No. 5) Debra Loscalzo, et al., respondents, v Intruck Leasing Corp., et al., defendants, EMH Consulting, et al., appellants. (Action No. 6) Thomas P. Zimmardi, et al., respondents, v Jose Alfredo Garcia, et al., defendants, EMH Consulting, et al., appellants. (Action No. 7) Bryan Pacelli, et al., plaintiffs, v Austin Environmental Corp., defendant. (Action No. 8) National Interstate Insurance Company, as of Schoolman Transportation System, Inc. plaintiffs, v Austin Environmental Corp., e (Action No. 9) National Interstate Insurance Company, as of Schoolman Transportation System, Inc. plaintiffs, v Omni Recycling of Westbury, (Action No. 10) G.E.I.C.O., as subrogee of Catherine Cohe v Intruck Leasing Corp., et al., defendants, Consulting, Inc., etc., et al., appellants. (Action No. 11) Bryan J. Pacelli, et al., respondents, v Jamaica Ash & Rubbish Removal Co., appellant, et al., defendants. (Action No. 12) (Index Nos. 12211/06, 16978/06, 5179/07, 4591/09, 15915/07, 14979/07, 13853/06, 2 14511/08, 4666/09, 4663/09, 1642/08)

ORDER ON APPLICATION subrogee , et al., ., tc., plaintiff, ndants. ants. nsulting, Inc., subrogee , et al., t al., defendants. subrogee , et al., Inc., defendant. n, respondent, EMH Inc., 9261/07, 633/08,

Application by the appellant EMH Consulting pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 7, 2013.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant EMH Consulting's time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until April 1, 2014, and the reply brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court