Verizon New York, Inc., formerly known as New York Tel
Motion No: 2013-01765
Slip Opinion No: 2014 NY Slip Op 73612(U)
Decided on June 2, 2014
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M174874

E/sl

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.

MARK C. DILLON

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL

COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

2013-01765

Verizon New York, Inc., formerly known

York Telephone Company, appellant-resp

v Supervisor of Town Oyster Bay, et al., d

third-party plaintiffs-respondents-appellan

defendants; County of Nassau, et al., third-

defendants-respondents.

(Appeal No. 1)

Verizon New York, Inc., formerly known

York Telephone Company, plaintiff, v Sup

Town Oyster Bay, et al., defendants third-

plaintiffs-respondents, et al., defendants; C

Nassau, et al., third-party defendants-appel

(Appeal No. 2)

(Index No. 8260/10)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

as New
ondent,
efendants
ts, et al.,
party



as New
ervisor of
party
ounty of
lants.

Motion by the defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents-appellants in Appeal No. 1 and defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents in Appeal No. 2 for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from a decision and order of this Court dated March 19, 2014, which determined appeals and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 3, 2012. Separate motion by the third-party defendants-respondents in Appeal No. 1 and third-party defendants-appellants in Appeal No. 2 for leave to reargue the appeals and cross appeal, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order dated March 19, 2014. Cross motion by the defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents-appellants in Appeal No. 1 and defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents in Appeal No. 2 for leave to reargue the appeals and cross appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motions and the cross motion are denied.

MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, LEVENTHAL and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court