Archstone v Tocci Building Corporation of New Jersey, In
Motion No: 2014-01779
Slip Opinion No: 2014 NY Slip Op 79538(U)
Decided on August 5, 2014
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M177943

E/ct

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.

THOMAS A. DICKERSON

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS

JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

2014-01779

Archstone, etc., et al., plaintiffs-appellants,

v Tocci Building Corporation of New Jersey, Inc.,

defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant, et al.,

defendants; Adjo Contracting Corporation,

third-party defendant-appellant, Sipala Landscape

Services, Inc., et al., third-party defendant-responden

et al., third-party defendants (and other titles).

(Index No. 1018/08)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION






t,

Motion by Robert Lee Crewdson and John S. Ducat III, attorneys in good standing in the State of Georgia, to be admitted pro hac vice to represent the plaintiffs-appellants, on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 25, 2013. By order to show cause dated June 12, 2014, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal by the plaintiffs-appellants on the ground that the plaintiffs-appellants are not aggrieved by the order entered November 25, 2013, and the motion was held in abeyance in the interim. Separate applications by Sipala Landscape Services, Inc., Stat Fire Suppression, Inc., and John Diorio Landscaping, Inc., pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file their respective briefs.

Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, upon the papers filed in support of the motion by Robert Lee Crewdson and John S. Ducat III and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal by the plaintiffs-appellants is held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeals for determination upon the argument or submission thereof; and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion by Robert Lee Crewdson and John S. Ducat III is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the applications are granted, the applicants' time to serve and file their respective briefs is enlarged until September 2, 2014, and the applicants' briefs must be served and filed on or before that date.

DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and MALTESE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court