IN THE MATTER OF PROBATE OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF ROBERT BODKIN ALSO KNOWN AS ROBERT C. BODKIN, DECEASED.

IN THE MATTER OF PROBATE OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF ROBERT BODKIN ALSO KNOWN AS ROBERT C. BODKIN, DECEASED.

Motion No: CA 14-01306

Slip Opinion No: 2014 NY Slip Op 81155(U)

Decided on August 20, 2014

Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.

August 20, 2014

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ.

DOCKET NO. CA 14-01306
DOCKET NO. CA 14-01307
DOCKET NO. CA 14-01308

IN THE MATTER OF PROBATE OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF
ROBERT BODKIN ALSO KNOWN AS ROBERT C. BODKIN, DECEASED.

DAWN GUETTI AND WILLIAM J. BODKIN, OBJECTANTS-APPELLANTS;
ROBIN GRAHAM, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, RESPONDENT.
IN THE MATTER OF PROBATE OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF
ROBERT BODKIN ALSO KNOWN AS ROBERT C. BODKIN, DECEASED.
————————————————————&m dash;———————
DAWN GUETTI AND WILLIAM J. BODKIN, OBJECTANTS-APPELLANTS;
ROBIN GRAHAM, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, RESPONDENT.
IN THE MATTER OF PROBATE OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF
ROBERT BODKIN ALSO KNOWN AS ROBERT C. BODKIN, DECEASED.
————————————————————&m dash;———————
DAWN GUETTI AND WILLIAM J. BODKIN, OBJECTANTS-APPELLANTS;
ROBIN GRAHAM, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, RESPONDENT.

Appellants having moved for an extension of time to perfect the appeals taken herein from orders of the Erie County Surrogate's Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of said court on October 2, 2012 (docket No. CA 14-01306), September 9, 2013 (docket No. CA 14-01307), and March 28, 2014 (docket No. CA 14-01308),

Now, upon reading and filing the affidavit of Katherine M. Liebner, Esq., sworn to July 23, 2014, and the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is dismissed as unnecessary and premature (see 22 NYCRR 1000.12 [b]; 1000.13 [f]).

Entered: August 20, 2014

Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk