JUSTIN COFFEE V TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC., AND WORLDWIDE INDUSTRIES CORP. WORLDWIDE INDUSTRIES CORP., THIRD PARTY
Motion No: CA 15-00267
Slip Opinion No: 2015 NY Slip Op 67462(U)
Decided on March 16, 2015
Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


March 16, 2015

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ.

DOCKET NO. CA 15-00267
DOCKET NO. CA 15-00289

JUSTIN COFFEE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V

TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC., AND WORLDWIDE INDUSTRIES

CORP., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

WORLDWIDE INDUSTRIES CORP., THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF,

V

CDK INDUSTRIES, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

JUSTIN COFFEE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V

TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,

AND WORLDWIDE INDUSTRIES CORP., DEFENDANT.


Defendant Tank Industry Consultants, Inc. having moved to consolidate the appeals taken herein from orders of the Supreme Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Onondaga on November 14, 2014 (appeal No. 1), and May 23, 2014 (appeal No. 2), and for an extension of time to perfect the appeals,

Now, upon reading and filing the affidavit of Stephen A. Davoli, Esq., sworn to January 5, 2015, and the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks to consolidate the appeals is denied, and

It is further ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks an extension of time to perfect appeal No. 1 is dismissed as moot, and

It is further ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks an extension of time to perfect appeal No. 2 is granted, and Tank Industry Consultants, Inc. shall perfect the appeal on or before May 26, 2015, and, in the event of failure to so perfect, the appeal is hereby dismissed without further order.

Memorandum: Tank Industry Consultants, Inc.'s remedy is to perfect appeal No. 2 and to move to reschedule either appeal so that the appeals can be heard and determined together.

Entered: March 16, 2015

Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk