| Matter of Scarborough v Wright |
| Motion No: 2014-11250 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2015 NY Slip Op 80423(U) |
| Decided on July 30, 2015 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M196263
E/sl
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
|
2014-11250
In the Matter of Selwyn Scarborough, respondent, v Karen Leigh Wright, appellant. (Docket Nos. V-9134-07/09D, V-9134-07/10E)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Karen Leigh Wright from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 30, 2014. By order to show cause dated June 12, 2015, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the attorney assigned by order on certification of this Court dated March 26, 2015, to perfect the appeal on behalf of the appellant on the ground that the attorney had been unable to contact the appellant, and dismissing the appeal.
Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, assigned counsel is relieved of the assignment, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).
DILLON, J.P., BALKIN, DICKERSON and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court