| Mileski v MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. |
| Motion No: 2014-11031 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2015 NY Slip Op 86596(U) |
| Decided on October 6, 2015 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M199569
E/sl
L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P.
SANDRA L. SGROI
JEFFREY A. COHEN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.
|
2014-11031, 2015-04222 Drena Mileski, etc., et al., respondents, v MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant, et al., defendants; Buffalo Machinery Co., Ltd., third-party defendant-appellant-respondent, et al., third-party defendants. (Index No. 10391/09)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the third-party defendant-appellant-respondent on appeals and cross appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 11, 2014, and March 3, 2015, respectively, inter alia, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals is granted, the third-party defendant-appellant-respondent's time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until November 5, 2015, and the joint record or appendix on the appeals and cross appeals (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the third-party defendant-appellant-respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeals, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
HALL, J.P., SGROI, COHEN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court