| Gullas v Roedel |
| Motion No: 2015-02195 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2015 NY Slip Op 92725(U) |
| Decided on December 7, 2015 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M202477
E/sl
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
SANDRA L. SGROI
ROBERT J. MILLER
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.
|
2015-02195 Cecilia Gullas, et al., appellants, v Dolores Roedel, et al., respondents. (Index No. 10594/14)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellants pro se, inter alia, to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 18, 2014, to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the record or appendix on appeal, to direct the Attorney General to intervene on the appeal, and to allow a certain party to serve and file an amicus curiae brief.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 19, 2016, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the record or appendix on appeal is denied with leave to renew by a motion made simultaneously with the perfection of the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to direct the Attorney General to intervene on the appeal is denied without prejudice to serving the Attorney General with notice pursuant to CPLR 1012(b) and Executive Law § 71; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to allow a certain party to file an amicus curiae brief is denied without prejudice to that party moving for leave to serve and file an amicus curiae brief.
CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court