| Manko v Gabay |
| Motion No: 2014-06055 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2016 NY Slip Op 61025(U) |
| Decided on January 13, 2016 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M204711
E/sl
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SANDRA L. SGROI
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
|
2014-06055 Nella Manko, appellant, v David A. Gabay, etc., et al., defendants, Bernard H. Broome, etc., et al., respondents. (Index No. 22148/13)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
2014-10523, 2015-11016
Nella Manko, appellant,
v David A. Gabay, et al., respondents,
et al., defendants.
(Index No. 22148/13)
Motion by the appellant pro se to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the appellant's appendix on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 25, 2014, to waive the filing fee for that appeal, to consolidate that appeal with appeals from two orders of the same court dated July 9, 2014, and October 8, 2014, respectively, for poor person relief, and to waive the motion filing fee.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the appellant's appendix with respect to the appeal from the order dated April 25, 2014, is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive the filing fee for that appeal is denied as academic as the filing fee was paid; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive the motion filing fee is denied as unnecessary (see CPLR 8022[b]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the appeals will be calendared together and will argued or submitted on the same date; and it is further,
ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the respondents' time to serve and file a brief with respect to the appeal from the order dated April 25, 2014, is enlarged until February 16, 2016, and the respondents' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court