| IN THE MATTER OF LEON R. KOZIOL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NATURAL PARENT OF CHILD A. AND CHILD B. V FAMILY COURT JUDGE |
| Motion No: OP 15-02140 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2016 NY Slip Op 69569(U) |
| Decided on April 6, 2016 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
DOCKET NO. OP 15-02140
| IN THE MATTER OF LEON R. KOZIOL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NATURAL PARENT
OF CHILD A. AND CHILD B., PETITIONER, V FAMILY COURT JUDGE DANIEL R. KING, WILLIAM KOSLOSKY, ATTORNEY FOR CHILD, KELLY
HAWSE-KOZIOL AND JOSEPH FLIHAN, RESPONDENTS. |
Petitioner having moved in this CPLR article 78 proceeding for leave to file an amended petition, and for other relief, and
Respondent William Koslosky, Esq., Attorney for the Child having moved to dismiss the proceeding for lack of jurisdiction and for a permanent filing injunction against petitioner, and
Respondent N. Joseph Flihan having moved to dismiss the proceeding for lack of jurisdiction, for a permanent filing injunction against petitioner, and for sanctions,
Now, upon reading and filing the affidavit and statement of Leon R. Koziol sworn to January 26, 2016, and dated March 4, 2016, the affidavits of Paul G. Ferrara, Esq., sworn to February 1, 2016, and February 4, 2016, the affidavit of William L. Koslosky, Esq., sworn to January 28, 2016, the affidavits of N. Joseph Flihan sworn to February 1, 2016, and February 23, 2016, the notices of motion with proof of service thereof, and the affidavit of Kelly Hawse Koziol sworn to January 30, 2016, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that petitioner's motion is denied in its entirety, and
It is further ORDERED that respondents William L. Koslosky, Esq. and N. Joseph Flihan's motions are granted insofar as they seek to dismiss the proceeding for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (see CPLR 506 [b] [1]; 7804 [b]), and the motions insofar as they seek a permanent filing injunction and sanctions are denied without prejudice.
Entered: April 6, 2016
Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk