CONTRACTORS COMPENSATION TRUST THROUGH ITS LICENSED ADMINISTRATOR, FIRST CARDINAL, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF THE CAUSES OF
Motion No: CA 16-00261
Slip Opinion No: 2016 NY Slip Op 70352(U)
Decided on April 8, 2016
Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


April 8, 2016

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ.

DOCKET NO. CA 16-00261

CONTRACTORS COMPENSATION TRUST THROUGH ITS LICENSED

THIRD-PARTY ADMINISTRATOR, FIRST CARDINAL, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE

OF THE CAUSES OF ACTION OF KENNETH WHITNEY, PLAINTIFF,

V

JACK OF HEARTS CARPET MILL OUTLET, INC. AND

RICH & GARDNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANTS.

(ACTION NO. 1.)

JACK OF HEARTS CARPET MILL OUTLET, THIRD-PARTY

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V

JAMES A. LAWSON DOING BUSINESS AS J & J CARPET AND LINOLEUM,

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

(ACTION NO. 2.)

RICH & GARDNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,

V

O'CONNELL ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS SYRACUSE

MERIT ELECTRIC, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

(ACTION NO. 3.)

CONTRACTORS COMPENSATION TRUST THROUGH ITS LICENSED

THIRD-PARTY ADMINISTRATOR, FIRST CARDINAL, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE

OF THE CAUSES OF ACTION OF KENNETH WHITNEY, PLAINTIFF,

V

JAMES A. LAWSON DOING BUSINESS AS J & J CARPET AND LINOLEUM,

DEFENDANT.

(ACTION NO. 4.)


Respondent Jack of Hearts Carpet Mill Outlet, Inc. having moved to dismiss the appeal taken herein from an order of the Supreme Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Onondaga on November 30, 2015, on the ground that the appeal is untimely pursuant to CPLR 5513 (a),

Now, upon reading and filing the affidavits of Maureen G. Fatcheric, Esq., sworn to February 17, 2016, and February 19, 2016, the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and the affirmation of Brady J. O'Malley, Esq., dated March 3, 2016, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied, without prejudice to arguments by the parties in their respective briefs addressing the timeliness of the appeal.

Entered: April 8, 2016

Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk