| Verizon New York, Inc., formerly known as New York Tel |
| Motion No: 2015-11168 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2016 NY Slip Op 74388(U) |
| Decided on May 24, 2016 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M212050
E/sl
L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
HECTOR D. LASALLE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.
|
2015-11168, 2015-11170, 2015-11171, 2015-11180, 2015-11184
Verizon New York, Inc., formerly known as New York Telephone Company, plaintiff- respondent, v Supervisor of Town of Hempstead, et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents Town of Hempstead Sanitary District 1, et al., defendants-respondents; County of Nassau, et al., third-party defendants-appellants. (Index Nos. 6858/02, 6578/01) (Actions Nos. 1 and 2) New York Telephone Company, plaintiff- respondent, v Supervisor of Town of Hempstead, et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents, Town of Hempstead Sanitary District 1, et al., defendants-respondents; County of Nassau, et al., third-party defendants-appellants. (Index Nos. 6794/00, 11522/99, 12177/98) (Actions Nos. 3, 4, and 5)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the third-party defendants-appellants on appeals in related actions from five judgments of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, all dated June 23, 2015 (one in each action), inter alia, to deem the brief to be filed in connection with the appeal under Appellate Division Docket No. 2015-11168 to also be filed in connection with the other appeals, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the appeals are consolidated, the parties shall serve and file a single record or appendix for all of the appeals and a single brief containing their points of arguments with respect to all of the appeals, responsive arguments, or arguments in reply, as the case may be, the parties shall file 13 copies of the record or appendix and their respective briefs, the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until July 25, 2016, and the motion is otherwise denied.
HALL, J.P., MILLER, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court