| Faistman v Faistman |
| Motion No: 2015-04130 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2016 NY Slip Op 76521(U) |
| Decided on June 13, 2016 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M213137
E/sl
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.
|
2015-04130 Rolando Faistman, appellant, v Sabrina Faistman, respondent. (Index No. 36248/06)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 27, 2015, for leave to file a notice of pendency, for clarification of two prior decisions and orders on motion of this Court, and to enlarge the record to include certain transcripts and motion papers.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the brief on the appeal is enlarged until July 28, 2016; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which for leave to file a notice of pendency is denied without prejudice to seeking any available remedy pursuant to CPLR 6501; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for clarification of two prior decisions and orders on motion of this Court is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the record to include transcripts and motion papers that were considered by the Supreme Court in determining the motions that resulted in the order dated February 27, 2015, is denied as unnecessary; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the record to include transcripts and motion papers that were not considered by the Supreme Court in determining the motions that resulted in the order dated February 27, 2015, is denied.
BALKIN, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court