| Niurka Andino v Ronald Mills |
| Motion No: |
| Slip Opinion No: 2016 NY Slip Op 83396 |
| Decided on August 25, 2016 |
| Court of Appeals Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Niurka Andino,
Appellant-Respondent,
v
Ronald Mills, et al.,
Respondents-Appellants.
(And a Third-Party Action.)
Appeals dismissed without costs, by the Courtsua sponte, upon the ground that the Appellate Division does not have the power to grant leave to appeal to this Court on a certified question from an order granting a new trial (see CPLR 5601[c]; 5602[b][1]; Maynard v Greenberg, 82 NY2d 913, 914 [1994]; Fishman v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 78 NY2d 878, 878 [1991]).