| Matter of Patrice Atwood v Markieth Pridgen |
| Motion No: 2016-952 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2016 NY Slip Op 85242 |
| Decided on September 9, 2016 |
| Court of Appeals Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
In the Matter of Patrice Atwood, et al.,
Respondents,
v
Markieth Pridgen, et al.,
Respondents,
Maurice McCray and Samuel Davis,
Appellants.
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [1929]).